// CASE STUDY · NAMED WITH PERMISSION

A 44-year-old manufacturer, measured before and after

Beckox Plastic Fabrications have built industrial process plant in Poole since 1982 — fume scrubbers and plating lines for a client list that includes Rolls-Royce and Wessex Water. Their website was ten years old, 67 megabytes, and invisible to Google for every product they make. We rebuilt it, and measured everything: same Lighthouse, same address, days apart.

  • ● Lighthouse 37 → 88
  • ● 43.7 s → 2.1 s
  • ● 605 words → 20,142

// SAME FIRM, SAME PHOTOGRAPHS

Their own work, finally given room

Every photograph on both versions is a real Beckox job — the old site just buried ninety-nine of them on one page. The rebuild is designed like an engineering drawing sheet, because that is the language their customers read all day.

Old · WordPress, c.2014 The old beckox.co.uk homepage: a dated blue WordPress theme with fourteen navigation links and an embedded video
The homepage until August 2026 — 67 MB, fourteen navigation links.
New · static The rebuilt beckox.co.uk homepage: bold condensed headline reading Bespoke plastic fabrication built to last, a real plating-line photograph and a fact strip
The same firm, rebuilt — what they build, in the first screen.
Old · narrow screen The old Beckox site on a narrow screen: stacked blue navigation fills the display before any content
New · narrow screen The rebuilt Beckox site on the same narrow screen: headline, fact strip and photograph in one view

// GOOGLE’S OWN TEST, TWICE

Same tool, same address, days apart

Most speed comparisons cheat somewhere — different tools, different days, a local server flattered against a live one. This one doesn’t: Google’s Lighthouse (v13.4.1), run against the live www.beckox.co.uk both times — the old site days before it was retired, the new site the hour it went live. Raw reports kept.

Lighthouse mobile, live www.beckox.co.uk, August 2026
Old (WordPress)New (static)Why it matters
Performance score37 / 10088 / 100Google’s overall speed grade under simulated slow-4G phone conditions — the stricter test, and the one that reflects a real visitor on a real phone.
Largest content painted43.7 s2.1 sHow long before the main content is actually on screen. At 43 seconds, everyone has left.
Time to interactive43.7 s2.1 sWhen the page will actually respond to a tap.
Total page weight62,725 KiB366 KiBSixty-one megabytes was ninety-nine full-resolution photographs on one page, none of them resized for the web.
SEO score92100
Best practices92100

Desktop tells the same story: 55 → 90, with the main content painted in 0.4 seconds instead of 10.1. And an honest footnote: the mobile 88 is not a perfect 100 — the entrance animation costs a few points of measured speed-index, a trade we made knowingly and will keep tuning.

// COUNTED, NOT ESTIMATED

The rest of the measurements

Counted in the browser with both sites loaded back to back, the same afternoon, while the old site still existed. Once a rebuild ships, the “before” column is gone forever — measuring it first is the discipline most rebuilds skip.

Both sites, same browser, same afternoon
Old (WordPress)New (static)Why it matters
Requests to load the homepage12711Every request is a round trip. Most of the old ones were images nobody asked for.
Images loaded997The photographs were the site’s best asset — and its biggest problem, all loading at once on one page.
Images missing alt text710Alt text is what screen readers announce and image search reads. It also matters to every AI tool that reads pages.
HTML delivered86 KB16 KB
Main headings on the page31Three H1s tells a search engine the page has three subjects — which is the same as having none.
Pages in the sitemap11632Only 20 of the old 116 were real pages; 93 were WordPress attachment clutter, one per uploaded image, each competing with the real ones.
Words of content, whole site60520,142Seventeen of the old site’s twenty pages had under fifty words. Three product pages — fume scrubbers, process sinks, process tanks — had none at all.

// THE RISKY PART

123 old addresses, zero left behind

Every address Google knew, collected

Search Console’s page list plus both of the old site’s sitemaps — including 93 image-attachment pages WordPress had quietly created, one per uploaded photograph, all in Google’s index.

Replayed by script before launch

Every rule tested against every address — which caught a subtle trap that would have broken all 93 attachment pages, before it could. 116 of 123 land on a real page; the WordPress leftovers answer 410 Gone on purpose.

12 of 20 real pages kept their address

The contact page, the about page, the gallery — where the old address made sense, the new site simply uses it. No redirect at all beats a perfect one.

// THE PART OTHER CASE STUDIES LEAVE OUT

What we are not claiming

The new site has been live for days. It has no ranking history, no traffic story and has not yet produced an enquiry we can point to. This page claims none of those things. The before-data is banked — ten clicks a fortnight, all brand — and Search Console will say what happened next. We will publish that comparison whatever it says.

One more thing worth knowing about how the site was written: it claims no certification, standard or accreditation of any kind, because none was verified with the firm before launch. Where we could not substantiate a capability, we removed it — including, late in the build, every mention of a material we could not confirm they fabricate. Their competitors’ websites make claims their firms may or may not hold. A site that wins an enquiry on a claim it cannot honour has not won anything.

Beckox appear here by written permission. Visit the finished site at beckox.co.uk — and if you are a process engineer who needs a fume scrubber, they are very good at those.

// GOOD QUESTIONS

Frequently asked

Can a website rebuild work for an industrial or B2B company?

This one is the answer. Beckox sell fume scrubbers and plating lines to process engineers — about as far from a consumer business as it gets. The principles are identical: the buyers search like anyone else, and the firm that actually answers their questions in print earns the enquiry. If anything B2B rewards it more, because so few industrial competitors bother.

What did the old site actually cost Beckox?

Invisibility, measured. In its final fortnight Google sent the site ten clicks — every single one someone searching the company’s own name or a misspelling of it. Searches for the products they made — “plastic welding”, “process tanks” — got five impressions between them, because the pages for those products contained almost no words for Google to read. A 44-year-old firm with Rolls-Royce on its client list was unfindable for its own trade.

Why do you keep saying what you are NOT claiming?

Because the new site went live days ago, so it has no ranking history and no traffic story yet — and any case study that claims one this early is inventing it. The before-measurements are banked and dated. Search Console will say what happened next, and this page will report it, whatever it says.

Did Beckox lose their Google standing in the switch?

Protecting it was most of the engineering. Every address Google knew — 123 of them, collected from Search Console and the old site’s own sitemaps, including 93 image-attachment pages — was replayed through the redirect rules by script before launch: 116 land on a real page and the WordPress leftovers answer 410 Gone. Twelve of the twenty real pages kept their exact address, which is better than any redirect.

The old site scored 92 for SEO. Doesn't that mean it was fine?

It is the perfect example of why single scores mislead. Lighthouse’s SEO check verifies mechanics — is there a title, is the page crawlable — not whether the content can rank. The old site passed the mechanics with 605 words across twenty pages and three product pages containing no text at all. Google’s own click data is the truer verdict: ten clicks a fortnight, all brand searches.

What does a rebuild like this cost?

A fixed, published price, agreed in writing before we start — it is on the website rebuild page rather than restated here, so there is exactly one place the number lives. The old site stays live until the new one is ready, which is also how both sites here could be measured back to back.

Will you name my business in a case study too?

Only if you say yes, and only after the work is done. Beckox appear on this page because Reg and Scott gave written permission; our first rebuild case study ran for weeks without naming the client until they agreed. Your name is yours.

Your site might be losing quietly too

The old Beckox site looked fine on a desk and was invisible in search — nobody knew until it was measured. Send us your web address and we will reply with the same tables you have just read, for your site, and a straight verdict: rebuild, fix what is there, or leave it alone. A rebuild is a fixed, published price — agreed in writing before we start.

01202 775566 · help@365techies.co.uk · MON–FRI 9AM–5PM